Pushing the boundaries of analysis, design and construction tools requires a certain mindset and team approach not frequently available to residential projects. A cultural center and residence for two permanent occupants on top of a hill in southern California is challenging as a sustainable design, but when design ideas, beauty and innovation are at the top of a client’s priority list right next to ambitious performance goals, the design and construction team must step up to the challenge.

The building at sunset.

Echelman sculpture and main stair.

Lower Level Bar with Tomas Saraceno piece (left) and dining area at sunset (right).

This project is a two-story mixed-use program combining an cultural  center (artist studios, exhibition galleries, office spaces and a 30-person theater) with a single-family residence. Designed by Robin Donaldson of Donaldson+Partners and the clients as an art piece, the project is conceived as an extension of the ridge top, with the entire program under a green roof garden and views south to the Pacific Ocean from the top floor. The building shell and structure is made of high-density concrete. The curved roof is cut off in areas to open up walls to views for large gallery spaces, as well as creating smaller working spaces and living areas for the rest of the program.

Programmatic and site conditions constrained the design, while the budget was primarily determined by value for cost. The clients desired a resilient net-zero building with superior occupant comfort and efficient energy systems. They wanted the ability to maintain operation during a power outage in response to environmental events and to function smoothly as climate change continued to impact the weather.

L+U helped develop the resiliency system, design the envelope and specify components including as insulation, thermal mass, glazing and shade to ensure  that the project fulfilled the California Energy Code requirements and also achieved net-zero energy performance and resiliency conditions in case of a long power outage caused by a natural disaster. We also provided interior, exterior and landscape lighting design, HVAC design assistance, thermal and visual comfort analysis, and curatorial studies to select ideal locations for art  exhibition based on light exposure throughout the year.

 

SERVICES

Daylighting improves the quality of visual comfort while reducing energy use. We use scale physical models and calibrated simulations with RADIANCE software and proprietary scripts to:
• Predict and evaluate illumination levels and light distribution
• Predict and analyze luminance gradients and glare potential
• Analyze thermal and energy use implications of daylighting design
• Design and evaluate daylighting to exhibition and curatorial performance criteria
• Predict energy savings from daylight harvesting
• Coordinate daylighting and electrical lighting design
• Post-occupancy HDRI analysis of luminance and visual comfort

See examples of our Daylighting Projects →

We provide full-service lighting design for building interiors, exteriors and landscape as well as specialized lighting for art. We work with the architect to reflect the aesthetic of the design and support the spatial experience with high performance and visually comfortable lighting.
• Specify luminaires, sources and layouts for electrical lighting
• Provide accurate renderings of lighting for evaluation
• Provide illumination levels for design evaluation as well as code requirements
• Provide lighting controls narrative and diagrams
• Arrange desk-top, lighting lab and/or in-situ mockups as appropriate to the project
• Provide aiming and lighting control observation
• Design custom fixtures
• Provide LEED credit documentation for lighting credits

See examples of our Lighting Design Projects →

Visual and thermal comfort in high-performance buildings rely on integrated glazing and curtain wall design. We use advanced simulation techniques to:
• Analyze visual performance of glazing alternatives
• Evaluate advanced glazing applications, including light redirecting glass and internal shading systems
• Predict and evaluate thermal performance of curtain wall systems
• Predict occupant comfort conditions for curtain wall alternatives
• Identify and coordinate value engineering tradeoffs for integrated high-performance facades

See examples of our Glazing Selection Projects →

Effective shading reduces glare and minimizes solar heat gain without impeding the use of daylight for visual tasks. We assist the architect to design shading appropriate to the program, the climate and context of the project. We use scale physical models and calibrated models with RADIANCE software to:
• Analyze site conditions for solar access and shade potential
• Design sun control and glare control alternatives for local skies and climate conditions
• Evaluate shade alternatives for visual and thermal comfort

See examples of our Shading Design Projects →

We provide accurate predictive or forensic analysis of the impact of solar reflections from building curtain walls. We evaluate both the visual and thermal impacts of solar reflections as well as reflection convergences. We use simulation techniques to quantify the impact of glazing selection and curtainwall design on the building’s surroundings.
• Characterize reflections to understand temporal and spatial patterns
• Use calibrated simulations of solar radiation to quantify intensity and distribution
• Design and evaluate mitigation alternatives

See examples of our Solar Reflections Projects →

We use thermal comfort as the first target of analysis in energy efficient building design. When people are comfortable, no energy will be needed to heat or cool the space they occupy. Using a variety of software tools, we generate:
• Annual hour-by-hour simulations of thermal conditions inside the building without mechanical systems
• Parametric analysis of the role of each building component in providing thermal comfort and autonomy
• Design recommendations for achieving greater thermal comfort and greater energy autonomy

See examples of our Thermal Comfort Projects →

We provide both performance energy modeling and regulatory modeling (such as Title 24) as part of the design process. Performance energy modeling is used to understand the actual energy use, without regulatory defaults, to better characterize and compare building performance and energy costs during design and after occupancy. We use EnergyPlus, a whole building energy simulation program with proprietary scripts to model energy consumption for heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and plug and process loads. We complete regulatory modeling to meet the permitting requirements of energy codes. Energy modeling includes:
• Simulating annual building energy use at all stages of design process
• Developing early energy use parametrics to identify energy saving opportunities in design alternatives
• Developing suites of energy strategies to reconsider conventional approaches to building energy use
• Comparison of mechanical strategies and HVAC systems in terms of energy use
• Green building certification
• Quantification of energy cost
• Future weather energy simulations

See examples of our Energy Modeling Projects →

Achieving zero-energy and zero-carbon requires the development of renewable energy sources to power building operation. We use energy simulations and other tools to:
• Quantify solar and wind potential
• Identify and size appropriate alternative energy sources including photovoltaic cells, wind turbines, and fuel cells
• Coordinate location and installation issues with the design team
• Identify renewable energy that can be sourced through public utilities and renewable energy vendors

See examples of our Renewable Energy Projects →

We design and install comprehensive building monitoring systems that generate insights related to resource use and occupant experience. Our systems include:
• sensors tracking energy use, system performance, and variables related to occupant comfort,
• scalable architecture designed to serve multiple buildings,
• proprietary software to collect, transmit, process and log data, and
• a centralized database for streamlining data mining, performance analytics, and controls research.

See examples of our Monitoring Projects →

Natural ventilation is a critical design and operational strategy for high-performance and low energy buildings, both residential and commercial, in most climates. Natural ventilation is driven by the building design, with inlets and outlets providing opportunity for cross-ventilation and/or stack-ventilation. We use a combination of software and a laboratory wind-tunnel to assist the design team to:
• Strategically identify and locate the path of ventilating air
• Quantify the available wind on site in terms of direction, velocity and patterns of availability
• Size and locate openings for incoming air and exhaust
• Coordinate the mechanical system with natural ventilation as an operating protocol

See examples of our Natural Ventilation Projects →

Resilient design has ability to adapt to changing conditions and to maintain or recover functionality after a disruption. In California we increasingly face disruptions in our use of buildings due to power outages caused by earthquakes, wildfires, landslides, floods and earthquakes. But it is also true that with climate change, no location seems to be free from potential natural disasters that may last a few days to months or years. Climate change itself is also a changing condition that needs to be designed for proactively rather than dealt with retroactively. Resilient design as we offer it as a service includes:
• Predicting potential future conditions resulting from abrupt or gradual change
• Simulating and designing for zero-energy as a baseline performance
• Simulating and designing for passive survivability for critical life-support conditions
• Designing renewable energy sources and storage for resilient scenarios
• Providing a manual for phases of disaster response and operation

See examples of our Resilience Projects →

A zero-energy building uses less energy over a year than it can generate and both certification organizations (such as USGBC) and State energy codes are beginning to mandate a zero-energy performance in the US and internationally. There are many variations in the definition and terminology, some grid-connected buildings are described as “zero-net-energy” buildings, buildings that are designed to be powered by on-site renewables but have not yet installed the site energy production are described as “zero-energy-ready”, etc. We assist the design team and client to establish a goal and then help design the building and renewable energy systems to achieve that goal. We use a wide range of the methods and tools described in our services to achieve the goal.

See examples of our Zero Energy Building Projects →

SPECIALTY SERVICES

L+U provides schematic system design for space conditioning and ventilation systems.  We work in coordination with the architect, mechanical engineer, and mechanical subcontractor to create comfortable and sustainable environments that are architecturally-integrated, cost-effective, and low-maintenance.

  • Preliminary system sizing and load calculations
  • Systems diagrams and controls sequence of operation narrative
  • Equipment performance and code compliance specifications
  • Preliminary equipment specification

L+U provides comprehensive art lighting consultation and design services. In coordination with the architect and/or curator, we design the luminous environments for art.

  • Inventory of Artwork and Conservation Requirements
  • Review of Artwork Locations
  • Lighting Controls Recommendations
  • Pricing and Quantities
  • Fixtures Samples and On-Site Meeting
  • Layout, Mounting Details, and Specifications
  • Shop Drawing and Submittal Review
  • Fixture Aiming and Light Level Commissioning

We work closely with the architect and landscape architect to illuminate the site and landscape.

  • Layout drawings and luminaire specifications
  • Lighting controls narrative and diagrams
  • Physically accurate renderings of lighting for evaluation
  • Illumination levels for design evaluation as well as code requirements
  • Arrange mockups
  • Aiming and lighting control observation
  • LEED credit documentation

Game room with open hangar door to avocado courtyard.

Main exhibition space with open hangar door to deck with views to the Pacific Ocean. Photo by Joe Fletcher.

“Behind The Scenes” (left) and “The Boulder” (right) exhibition spaces.

Kusama piece in southern deck.

The configuration of the building initially included a series of concave courtyards with  curved glass facades that faced all orientations. L+U examined the potential for solar convergence to occur at those locations given the radius of the curved glass and its specifications. Simulation results are presented as an annual animation on a plan view, with peak values above 500 watts/m2 called out at every frame. This analysis showed that in several locations the convergence phenomenon would at times create conditions “beyond simple human discomfort to potentially more dangerous exposures”. Using this feedback, the team worked on redesigning the facade and selecting the glazing specifications to prevent this phenomena (and avoiding setting things on fire).

Animation of Peak Convergence Values during the year.

Other solar reflection studies addressed unpleasant reflections coming from direct sun on reflective finishes such as mirrored glass. The goal was to define if / when these surfaces received sun exposure and whether this could be concerning to the owners or even the surrounding neighbors.

View of mirrored guardrail installed on site (left) and view of gallery from entry bridge (right).

Diagram showing direct sun (low afternoon low angle sun) on curtain wall reflecting off mirrored guardrail.

Human Perception of Veiling Glare (left) and Falsecolor Luminance (right) describing condition on April 23rd, at 7pm.

View from main Gallery Space: Human Perception of Veiling Glare (left) and Falsecolor Luminance (right) describing condition on April 23rd, at 7pm.

Early daylight analysis helped identify potential issues that might arise from the glazing and apertures. One issue was visual comfort from the large glazed south facing façade, since the disc of the sun would remain within the field of view for a few hours. Critical tasks such are reading a book or working on a computer might not take place in some of theses larger, art exhibition spaces but other activities would still be uncomfortable under such extreme conditions.

Extended exposure to direct sunlight can damage and fade artwork. In the case of paintings, additionally, regular overheating due to solar exposure can cause degradation and cracking of the paint. Not only the integrity of the artwork can be at risk, but also the whole experience of observing and contemplating the art could be affected if the wall where is mounted is overwhelmingly bright due to sunlight.

For this reason, the owners requested a curatorial analysis to help locating the least sensitive art pieces in the most exposed locations, and to try to prevent light damage and its irreversible effects on the most sensitive art pieces by locating them in spaces with very limited daylight exposure.

For each art display location, we provided supporting analysis results that described source (façade or skylight), cumulative hours throughout the year, timing and patterns of direct sun on each wall, in addition to instantaneous light levels during various sky conditions.

Anish Kapoor piece installed and reflecting early morning sunlight (left), simulation rendering showing direct sun on wall from north facing glazed façade (center), false color rendering showing cumulative hours of direct sun annually (right).

View of main exhibition space with Anish Kapoor piece and Echelman gallery (photograph by Joe Fletcher).

Instantaneous Illuminance Levels shown in simulation rendering for March 21st with clear skies.

Lighting design connects the interior and exterior spaces, art, and landscape. Mock-ups and Radiance simulations were used extensively to fine tune the lighting design, fixture specifications, and controls throughout.

Hill House Cultural Center Lighting Design

In order to predict the ideal properties of the envelope for this climate and this site, we modeled a series of iterations, parametrically modifying the thickness of the insulation in each part of the envelope.  This helped  to identify a reasonable R value on the roof and in the walls that would optimize the building performance.
The team specified high performance glazing systems in order to achieve California Code compliance. Parametric analysis for the glazed areas of the façade focused on exterior shading devices as opportunities to improve performance and avoid direct sun hitting the window surface and thus, overheating the interior.

South facing curtain wall at sunset.

Simulations of annual thermal autonomy looked at how many hours the building would be uncomfortably warm or cool if there were no mechanical system and how to control a mechanical system to deliver maximum occupant thermal comfort. Thermal comfort load factors helped define the envelope design and material specification. The results set the basis for simulations of staged responses of mechanical systems.

The building is conditioned by two parallel systems: a hydronic radiant system embedded in the concrete topping slab and a supplemental air-side system with Fan Coil units. This air system is designed to accommodate deviations that may cause occupant discomfort when a quick response is needed due to changes in the internal loads (such as large occupancy events).

In order to assist with the design of the radiant system, we analyzed the solar loads that it would need to absorb when cooling and suggested zoning to support optimized performance. When the sun enters the building and hits the floor, the radiant system will cool down the surface in that location to keep the operative temperature in the space within the target setpoints. If a zone for the radiant system is not controlled in this way, the floor may overheat in the areas where the solar radiation enters the building, or overcool in the other areas included in the same zone but that remain in the shade.

Using visualizations showing cumulative loads and considering system capacity limitations, we defined the areas and location of each zone, considering also occasional patterns as shown in seasonal peak load images.

This shows how much solar radiation hits each area of the floor throughout June 21st only. It cumulatively shows all the solar radiation values that occur during that day. It is relevant to note that the area with the highest values corresponds to floor receiving both solar radiation through the southwest facing curtain wall and the daily living skylight.

Another important consideration in this project with irregular high load scenarios is that HVAC systems are typically designed to address peak load conditions even though the system operates under part load conditions the vast majority of the time.

L+U provided histograms that showed the frequency (number of hours) of the peak loads for cooling and heating. The HVAC system was thus designed to not only meet peak load conditions but also to operate efficiently at part load, allowing the system to be turned down when loads are reduced and/or when spaces are unoccupied.

Solar Daily Peak values on main floor on June 21st (left) describing how much solar radiation falls on any given area and patterns of sun movement through the interior of the building. Histogram (right) showing the number of hours per year that each cooling peak demand load will happen in the building as designed with an air system.

Zero-net-energy and resilience aspects of the design were considered in order to reduce negative impacts on climate (mitigation) as well as prepare for extreme events resulting from climate change (adaptation).

Initially, the design team and the clients were interested in analyzing energy performance from a Zero-Net-Energy standpoint. The first studies were developed to predict the building energy use under normal operation and typical annual weather conditions, then compare the results to the annual site solar energy generation potential.

We modeled the building as designed and chose a series of strategies that would be most beneficial in reducing energy use while maximizing occupant thermal and visual comfort. Combinations of such strategies were modeled in suites and compared against benchmark data for buildings of similar size in this climate.

For these analyses, L+U used both predictive energy models in EnergyPlus and California Energy Code models in EnergyPro.  The latter was used to prove compliance of the project when compared to a baseline, working around limitations in modeling the various sustainable features and complex geometry included in the project.

Aerial view of the building showing the PV arrays to the south side of the site. Photo by Bruce Heavin.

Actual performance during occupancy is being monitored with a comprehensive performance monitoring system consisting of sensors to monitor indoor environmental conditions, electricity production and usage, and weather conditions. This provides the clients with access to data in real time, trends and usage profiles, allowing them to make informed decisions and adapt their behavior.

The monitoring data is also used to establish ongoing comfort and energy performance for use in future performance diagnosis and verification, track energy production versus use of the building, and track battery charging and discharging.

Ensuring the design provided an adequate amount of thermally and visually autonomous spaces with no mechanical nor electric lighting systems became the focus of the analysis efforts early in the design process. This required a multi-level design approach to balance shading, daylighting and thermal needs and diversify the strategies to effectively respond to the interior conditions depending on the time of day, season and program requirements. This occupant-centered analysis relied on iterative simulations and analysis to switch the project’s focus beyond achieving resiliency to collaboratively developing an approach of gentle failure that explored the project’s goals beyond an energy use target. This contrasts with a more typical segmented approach to resilient design in which energy use strategies are considered separately and resiliency is reduced to energy generation and storage system sizes.

View of photovoltaic panel arrays installed on-site.

Battery Capacity Requirements for 72-hr Event. This graph shows frequency of battery size needed for every 72hr period throughout the year. If the battery needs to have enough capacity to provide energy during 72 hours and is supplemented with the energy produced by the PV panels anticipated for the poolside sloped surface, a 1,200kWh battery will cover every 3-day period of the year, and a 700 kWh would suffice about half of the time.

Hourly Energy Use (By Source) (bottom) and Battery Energy Storage (top) for cloudiest 7 day period with power outage. This graph shows the source for the energy use in the house and the energy stored in a 1,200kWh battery during a one week period, with a three day power outage during the most cloudy 72 hours of the year.